Therefore, at that time, Apple's internal estimate was that if the production line of mobile phones was moved back to the United States, about 8,700 engineers majoring in industrial engineering would be needed to manage the assembly line of about 200,000 people, and the graduates of the department in the United States would be talented in one year. Only 7,000 people - remember, this is just the manpower requirement for "a business". So Apple's response to the U.S. government is that the U.S. has not cultivated enough suitable talents and a supply chain with clustering advantages, which has led to the company having to leave China in order to survive.
However, what the whatsapp database industry knew very well was that at that time, only China was willing to cooperate with big companies, turn a blind eye, and use the lowest cost and fastest way to provide flexible and abundant manpower. HONG KONG, CHINA - MARCH 19: Apple Store in the city center on March, 19, 2013, Hong Kong, China. Apple is a very popular worldwide brand name. Photo Credit: Depositphotos Observing the relocation of American manufacturing and the M-polarized society in the past decade, history has told us that the pursuit of unbalanced short-term gains at the expense of the health and income of middle-class workers will lead to long-term employment opportunities in the talent market. churn, and the entire system shrinks more negatively due to self-feedback.
Moreover, these "short-term" profits that only benefit the upper-level M-shaped society in the two upper classes have "long-term" national and social costs: Chinese suppliers first grab the market at low prices, then reverse engineer and steal technology to obtain supply chain tickets. Finally, it is not uncommon to integrate the surrounding supply chain and become an official brand owner. Although Tesla finally set up a wholly-owned factory in China, and we are willing to believe that Tesla and the Shanghai government will treat their employees well, the precedents of major automakers such as Toyota and Nissan only make us more pessimistic.